The more suffering that could be removed, the better, but eventually you’ll hit a point where removing more suffering is no longer feasible or worth focusing on, because there will be suffering easier to remove elsewhere.
Really, what I’m looking for, is the point where the net suffering to produce the food is equal to or less than the net benefit the production of the food provides.
The more suffering that could be removed, the better, but eventually you’ll hit a point where removing more suffering is no longer feasible or worth focusing on, because there will be suffering easier to remove elsewhere.
Really, what I’m looking for, is the point where the net suffering to produce the food is equal to or less than the net benefit the production of the food provides.