To clarify something that tripped me up for other readers: F1-score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, so that Table 2 (given in a screenshot in this post) from the Oct 2025 EditLens paper is meaningful on its own (it’s not just “accuracy” with no mention of false positives).
(The recent Pangram 3.3 has false positive rates of less than 0.5-1.5%, sometimes less than 0.05%, depending on the human-written dataset it’s tested on.)
To clarify something that tripped me up for other readers: F1-score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, so that Table 2 (given in a screenshot in this post) from the Oct 2025 EditLens paper is meaningful on its own (it’s not just “accuracy” with no mention of false positives).
(The recent Pangram 3.3 has false positive rates of less than 0.5-1.5%, sometimes less than 0.05%, depending on the human-written dataset it’s tested on.)