According to this analogy, we previously thought e to be 2. Now it’s 2.6 recurring. We’re making progress, of a sort.
Reminds me of The Relativity of Wrong.
Not if what you’re trying to calculate is e^(-5).
According to this analogy, we previously thought e to be 2. Now it’s 2.6 recurring. We’re making progress, of a sort.
Reminds me of The Relativity of Wrong.
Not if what you’re trying to calculate is e^(-5).