I second the other commentors questioning what, precisely, it is that this distinction is meant to accomplish. And also pointing out the very human and instrumental reasons why movements and causing end up converging on similar structures and dynamics.
To add to that, recall that It is the chief characteristic of the religion of science that it works. Among religions, there are different shades/degrees of how much they reflect the reasons we have concerns about the things we call religions. They come in different shades of gray. Which is exactly why that linked post mentions that “If science is a religion, it is the religion that heals the sick and reveals the secrets of the stars.”
Rationality aims (and claims) to be more in the vein of science in this way, and less in the vein of Christianity.
I second the other commentors questioning what, precisely, it is that this distinction is meant to accomplish. And also pointing out the very human and instrumental reasons why movements and causing end up converging on similar structures and dynamics.
To add to that, recall that It is the chief characteristic of the religion of science that it works. Among religions, there are different shades/degrees of how much they reflect the reasons we have concerns about the things we call religions. They come in different shades of gray. Which is exactly why that linked post mentions that “If science is a religion, it is the religion that heals the sick and reveals the secrets of the stars.”
Rationality aims (and claims) to be more in the vein of science in this way, and less in the vein of Christianity.