Right, I think that’s the hypothesis I was asking whether you had when I said
unless you mean the randomness was in an underlying valance factor?
If so, yeah, this is compatible. I’d still put notably higher odds on the original thing I suggested, but this is the other main hypothesis.
Right, I think that’s the hypothesis I was asking whether you had when I said
If so, yeah, this is compatible. I’d still put notably higher odds on the original thing I suggested, but this is the other main hypothesis.