Don’t usually post here but feel compelled to do so after seeing this. This post specifically is being cited to as causing a “conflict of interest” on the talk page of the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mechanistic_interpretability#Bad_sourcing,_COI_editing. I substantially edited the mech interp wiki page before this (I believe a majority of the bytes of the page are mine now) but some of my contributions are being removed for e.g. citing arXiv papers that are apparently not good sources (never mind them being highly cited and used by others in the field). I wonder if the comments on this article caused a kind of negative polarisation. Now I generally feel like I’d rather write my own separate thing rather than get dragged into this mess.
Hi Aryaman, thanks again for the great technical writeup in the mech interp article. Moving to the mech interp talk page to address the COI and RS concerns.
Don’t usually post here but feel compelled to do so after seeing this. This post specifically is being cited to as causing a “conflict of interest” on the talk page of the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mechanistic_interpretability#Bad_sourcing,_COI_editing. I substantially edited the mech interp wiki page before this (I believe a majority of the bytes of the page are mine now) but some of my contributions are being removed for e.g. citing arXiv papers that are apparently not good sources (never mind them being highly cited and used by others in the field). I wonder if the comments on this article caused a kind of negative polarisation. Now I generally feel like I’d rather write my own separate thing rather than get dragged into this mess.
Hi Aryaman, thanks again for the great technical writeup in the mech interp article. Moving to the mech interp talk page to address the COI and RS concerns.