people who have to avoid any discussion at all that has even indirect and remote implications about sensitive topics for fear of discourse breaking down have no grounds for claiming to be somehow more “rational” than others
Maybe they do, maybe they don’t, but you didn’t ask. Basically you infer a conclusion here, and claim that no proof to the contrary is therefore possible.
Maybe they do, maybe they don’t, but you didn’t ask. Basically you infer a conclusion here, and claim that no proof to the contrary is therefore possible.