Wikipedia was one example of a challengingly messy corpus, though I do think there’s a sharp division between articles that make you know more stuff and articles that don’t). I personally wouldn’t consider the orogeny article akrasiatic.
It is possible I’m working from a quite specific definition of akrasia in this case.
Wikipedia was one example of a challengingly messy corpus, though I do think there’s a sharp division between articles that make you know more stuff and articles that don’t). I personally wouldn’t consider the orogeny article akrasiatic.
It is possible I’m working from a quite specific definition of akrasia in this case.
(You need to put a backslash before any )’s in URLs, e.g. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blossom_(TV_series\)).)
(Done)