Thanks for the answer! That confirms what I was thinking.
That second case: (s1,w1)→(s2,w2) and (s1,w3)→(s2,w2) surprised me since I initially thought that the IMP implied that there was an additional isomorphism between the controller and the environment. I guess that isomorphism effectively still exists since it can be created through the use of coarse graining over the controller states like you mentioned.
Thanks for the answer! That confirms what I was thinking.
That second case: (s1,w1)→(s2,w2) and (s1,w3)→(s2,w2) surprised me since I initially thought that the IMP implied that there was an additional isomorphism between the controller and the environment. I guess that isomorphism effectively still exists since it can be created through the use of coarse graining over the controller states like you mentioned.