But no, what surprised me was that people would seriously assert that “physics does not apply”, and then turn around and say “no law of physics is broken”.
What’s so surprising about extrapolating “different laws in different jurisdictions” to “different laws in different magisteria”? Consider the mental model where physics is not “fundamental”. Then it follows that “physics does not apply” (to a different magisterium) is logically distinct from “laws of physics are broken” (in the same magisterium).
The typical mind fallacy, obviously!
But no, what surprised me was that people would seriously assert that “physics does not apply”, and then turn around and say “no law of physics is broken”.
What’s so surprising about extrapolating “different laws in different jurisdictions” to “different laws in different magisteria”? Consider the mental model where physics is not “fundamental”. Then it follows that “physics does not apply” (to a different magisterium) is logically distinct from “laws of physics are broken” (in the same magisterium).