Firstly, I agree that this post covers many highly relevant considerations for how AI may develop over the next years, and why.
That said, it’s quite meandering and I feel like it could convey its key points in probably a third of the words. And the most likely reason for that is that it seems largely LLM-written, with LLM prose having a tendency to be very verbose, performative and full of “punchlines”, rather than just getting to the point. Imho future posts, if you decide to post more on lesswrong, would benefit a lot from having more of your own voice, which, I suspect, would automatically improve the length/focus part as well.
Firstly, I agree that this post covers many highly relevant considerations for how AI may develop over the next years, and why.
That said, it’s quite meandering and I feel like it could convey its key points in probably a third of the words. And the most likely reason for that is that it seems largely LLM-written, with LLM prose having a tendency to be very verbose, performative and full of “punchlines”, rather than just getting to the point. Imho future posts, if you decide to post more on lesswrong, would benefit a lot from having more of your own voice, which, I suspect, would automatically improve the length/focus part as well.