I thought the actual point of this article was nifty, but I thought this was stupid:
If God has not given intelligence in equal measure to all his children, God stands convicted of a crime against humanity, period.
As much as you open/close this, there isn’t nearly enough in this article to justify the claim. I am not asking you to justify it. I am just curious why you include something like this in an otherwise focused article. What is the point of having this and saying it the way you did? To me, it just sounds like “Boo God!”
I had a hard time deciding whether to ask this question to just let it go. I figured asking would sound too petty or trollish. But I posted it anyway. I don’t know if I have seen your answer to this yet.
I thought the actual point of this article was nifty, but I thought this was stupid:
As much as you open/close this, there isn’t nearly enough in this article to justify the claim. I am not asking you to justify it. I am just curious why you include something like this in an otherwise focused article. What is the point of having this and saying it the way you did? To me, it just sounds like “Boo God!”
I had a hard time deciding whether to ask this question to just let it go. I figured asking would sound too petty or trollish. But I posted it anyway. I don’t know if I have seen your answer to this yet.