there’s always a chance you’re in a simulation being run by Omega. I think if you can account for that, it SHOULD patch most decent decision-theories up.
Yes, reflective consistency tends to make things better.
um...that wasn’t sarcastic, was it? I just ran low on mental energy so...
anyways, the downside is you have to figure out how to dissolve all or most of the anthropic paradoxes when evaluating simulation chance.
Yes, reflective consistency tends to make things better.
um...that wasn’t sarcastic, was it? I just ran low on mental energy so...
anyways, the downside is you have to figure out how to dissolve all or most of the anthropic paradoxes when evaluating simulation chance.