This actually looks like a fully general argument if favor of any status quo.
This makes no sense as a criticism unless you think it’s claimed to be very powerful. If it can be weak, then sure, it’s a fully general argument in favor of any status quo, and that’s A-OK, and it’s fairly obviously A-OK, so what are you complaining about?
(this was edited to completely replace its contents)
...and nor did I criticize it for that.
So where did this whole idea come from?
This makes no sense as a criticism unless you think it’s claimed to be very powerful. If it can be weak, then sure, it’s a fully general argument in favor of any status quo, and that’s A-OK, and it’s fairly obviously A-OK, so what are you complaining about?
(this was edited to completely replace its contents)