I’m trying to argue that it also requires exposure to harm for minds worth being
Ok. And, I take it, you’re not just saying “in practice, it’s often infeasible to separate the harm risk”. Yeah, my guess is we disagree about this, if by “requires” you mean “as a conceptually essential element of this kind of openness” (like how some amount of suffering might be an essential element of learning).
Ok. And, I take it, you’re not just saying “in practice, it’s often infeasible to separate the harm risk”. Yeah, my guess is we disagree about this, if by “requires” you mean “as a conceptually essential element of this kind of openness” (like how some amount of suffering might be an essential element of learning).