I don’t see anything ‘false’ about the statement. I simply stated some other
fields that have been used to explain aspects of the brain as well, and that,
while PCT may be a useful addition, I have seen no evidence yet that it is ‘life
changing’.
I enjoy reading LW for all the bright people and new ideas things to learn. In
this case however, I was a bit disappointed, mainly because of the
self-help-fluff. There are enough places for that kind of material already, I think.
Of course, I cannot demand anything, it’s just some (selfish?) concern for LW’s S/N-ratio.
I don’t see anything ‘false’ about the statement. I simply stated some other fields that have been used to explain aspects of the brain as well, and that, while PCT may be a useful addition, I have seen no evidence yet that it is ‘life changing’.
I enjoy reading LW for all the bright people and new ideas things to learn. In this case however, I was a bit disappointed, mainly because of the self-help-fluff. There are enough places for that kind of material already, I think.
Of course, I cannot demand anything, it’s just some (selfish?) concern for LW’s S/N-ratio.