Cool, yeah, some of these renames were due to the Discord limitation of stripping punctuation and don’t apply back here.
Seems like nitpick is much more a property of the claim and the discussion, rather than the person reading it.
So, kinda, but imagine that different people have developed different nitpick-detector-circuits / aka definitions, and you get that react when you don’t consider it to have been a nitpick. This can collide with the parts of your world-model unnecessarily and at least slightly suffering-inducingly, which is kinda the core insight under NVC.
But the nitpick one’s probably got small enough likelihood of anything notable to be fine, meta meta nitpick accepted with amusement.
I think
Missed the point
Weak Argument
are much more notable offenders along this axis, as those words are often used in heat not as epistemic markers. I used Missed Intended Point imo, you could use Missed Intended Point?, and maybe Invalid Argument? would work here for the other one?
Cool, yeah, some of these renames were due to the Discord limitation of stripping punctuation and don’t apply back here.
So, kinda, but imagine that different people have developed different nitpick-detector-circuits / aka definitions, and you get that react when you don’t consider it to have been a nitpick. This can collide with the parts of your world-model unnecessarily and at least slightly suffering-inducingly, which is kinda the core insight under NVC.
But the nitpick one’s probably got small enough likelihood of anything notable to be fine, meta meta nitpick accepted with amusement.
I think
Missed the point
Weak Argument
are much more notable offenders along this axis, as those words are often used in heat not as epistemic markers. I used Missed Intended Point imo, you could use Missed Intended Point?, and maybe Invalid Argument? would work here for the other one?