And with the number of fake researchers apparently staying roughly even for a period of fifty years, looking from the way the effect size hasn’t changed?
That right there is a really good point I didn’t think of. As for motive, my impression is that a lot of parapsychologists are trying to demonstrate the truth of beliefs that are incredibly significant to them—their new age spirituality is at stake. For that matter, if they’ve dedicated their lives to the subject. If there are no psychic phenomena they have literally spent their lives studying nothing. You might as well ask why theologians never come up with arguments disproving the existence of God. But your point about consistency makes this all moot. I’ll check out the book.
That right there is a really good point I didn’t think of. As for motive, my impression is that a lot of parapsychologists are trying to demonstrate the truth of beliefs that are incredibly significant to them—their new age spirituality is at stake. For that matter, if they’ve dedicated their lives to the subject. If there are no psychic phenomena they have literally spent their lives studying nothing. You might as well ask why theologians never come up with arguments disproving the existence of God. But your point about consistency makes this all moot. I’ll check out the book.
Well if they do they get called philosophers of religion instead...