I don’t think this post really has much to do with the “orthogonality thesis”, as I understand the term.
I didn’t read the post as having much to do with the orthogonality thesis either, and hence I made no mention of the orthogonality thesis in my summary.
I nonetheless do think the idea of a spectrum from systems that are well factored into objectives/goals/values, world models, and reasoners/planners to systems where these components are all intertwined is useful/valuable.
And the post correctly identifies relevant considerations, tradeoffs, etc. I found it very much well worth reading.
I didn’t read the post as having much to do with the orthogonality thesis either, and hence I made no mention of the orthogonality thesis in my summary.
I nonetheless do think the idea of a spectrum from systems that are well factored into objectives/goals/values, world models, and reasoners/planners to systems where these components are all intertwined is useful/valuable.
And the post correctly identifies relevant considerations, tradeoffs, etc. I found it very much well worth reading.