Are house-buyers, scholars, academics and bloggers the sanity waterline you hope to reach and raise? That is who you speak of and to. I suggest these are closer to the high water marks. With exactly zero inference on the truth value of any religion, I suggest people who are religious by their own account are closer to a waterline of sanity. Who is in the middle of the sanity curve? You seem to be talking to one end of it.
And do you have anything for people whose brains are physically incapable of sanity? Traumatic brain injury, chemical imbalances, people who are high or children, for instance.
Children are capable of sanity. They simply know little and don’t have long-term goals. But they are good at tracking what they do understand; this might be used for training.
Objects continue to exist when we don’t see them. Other people have thoughts that are different from our thoughts. Water does not change its amount when poured from one container to another. Language. Children, at different ages, do not have the physical capability of understanding these facts. It isn’t that they are miniature adults who have yet to learn things. They cannot learn these things, cannot act on them, cannot perceive them in others. Later, they can. Infants and children are cognitively distinct from adults. There is a change from infant to child to adult (for the lucky), but they are not all the same. Something I keep in my mind when I read people write what is best for all people regarding rational thought. The cloud of ideas that is rational thought is not evenly distributed.
You are right, this article talks to one end of the sanity curve. The goal of Intentional Insights is to have content aimed at different parts of the sanity curve as well, for example here in the form of a popular listicle and here in the form of a video for religious people.
Nope, nothing for people whose brains are physically incapable of sanity.
Are house-buyers, scholars, academics and bloggers the sanity waterline you hope to reach and raise? That is who you speak of and to. I suggest these are closer to the high water marks. With exactly zero inference on the truth value of any religion, I suggest people who are religious by their own account are closer to a waterline of sanity. Who is in the middle of the sanity curve? You seem to be talking to one end of it.
And do you have anything for people whose brains are physically incapable of sanity? Traumatic brain injury, chemical imbalances, people who are high or children, for instance.
Children are capable of sanity. They simply know little and don’t have long-term goals. But they are good at tracking what they do understand; this might be used for training.
Objects continue to exist when we don’t see them. Other people have thoughts that are different from our thoughts. Water does not change its amount when poured from one container to another. Language. Children, at different ages, do not have the physical capability of understanding these facts. It isn’t that they are miniature adults who have yet to learn things. They cannot learn these things, cannot act on them, cannot perceive them in others. Later, they can. Infants and children are cognitively distinct from adults. There is a change from infant to child to adult (for the lucky), but they are not all the same. Something I keep in my mind when I read people write what is best for all people regarding rational thought. The cloud of ideas that is rational thought is not evenly distributed.
You are right, this article talks to one end of the sanity curve. The goal of Intentional Insights is to have content aimed at different parts of the sanity curve as well, for example here in the form of a popular listicle and here in the form of a video for religious people.
Nope, nothing for people whose brains are physically incapable of sanity.