The implication is that if you have a bunch of different agents going their own ways with no powerful agreement between them, then any one of them might change into something potentially dangerous to all of them; but if there’s initially a single agent or some way for all agents to coordinate, then they can put into place strong enough safeguards to avoid those problems...
Wise singleton, perhaps?
The implication is that if you have a bunch of different agents going their own ways with no powerful agreement between them, then any one of them might change into something potentially dangerous to all of them; but if there’s initially a single agent or some way for all agents to coordinate, then they can put into place strong enough safeguards to avoid those problems...
P.S. A thousand thanks for doing this!