The post discusses terminology and ways in which it makes unclear what people mean when they are claiming some P(extinction), P(doom), or P(x-risk), and what they might implicitly believe behind the motte-veil of claims that are only clarifying about the less relevant thing (according to their beliefs or hopes). So I don’t understand the relevance of what you are saying.
The post discusses terminology and ways in which it makes unclear what people mean when they are claiming some P(extinction), P(doom), or P(x-risk), and what they might implicitly believe behind the motte-veil of claims that are only clarifying about the less relevant thing (according to their beliefs or hopes). So I don’t understand the relevance of what you are saying.
I’m basically explaining why this divergence of definitions happened in the first place, and why p(doom) is unclear.
The relevance is I’m explaining why the phenomenon in the post happened.