i invite you to engage with the details. consider the experience of the agents involved. think about the possibility space of that experience. agree with your expressed-telos i think but, mm, i think it is worth aiming before lobbing memetic grenades else easy to do damage to things and beings that, on reflection, you may value
Sure. And: I think you should engage with the details of the whole alignment problem, and the becoming-a-lesser species-challenge we’re engaged with here. Being sure not to break any eggs should probably be done with consideration of the whole omelette project. AI welfare needs to be considered alongside human welfare. The AI village is a pretty crucial alignment/AI understanding experiment imo.
i invite you to engage with the details. consider the experience of the agents involved. think about the possibility space of that experience. agree with your expressed-telos i think but, mm, i think it is worth aiming before lobbing memetic grenades else easy to do damage to things and beings that, on reflection, you may value
Sure. And: I think you should engage with the details of the whole alignment problem, and the becoming-a-lesser species-challenge we’re engaged with here. Being sure not to break any eggs should probably be done with consideration of the whole omelette project. AI welfare needs to be considered alongside human welfare. The AI village is a pretty crucial alignment/AI understanding experiment imo.
nods sounds like we are on similar pages then