I’m currently fairly swayed that the alignment forum should be more “open” in the sense Peter intends:
Per my definition of closed, no academic discussion is closed, because anyone in theory can get a paper accepted to a journal/conference, attend the related meaning, and participate in the discourse. I am not actually talking about visibility to the broader public, but rather the access of any individual to the discourse, which feels more important to me.
However, I am not sure how to accomplish this. (Specifically, I am not sure how to accomplish this without too much added work, and maintaining other properties we want the forum to have.)
I’m currently fairly swayed that the alignment forum should be more “open” in the sense Peter intends:
However, I am not sure how to accomplish this. (Specifically, I am not sure how to accomplish this without too much added work, and maintaining other properties we want the forum to have.)