A question for more experienced LW-ers. Is it appropriate for me to tie all of these posts on moral motivation into a sequence? I’m not quite sure what is considered “sequence-worthy.” The sequence page says this:
A sequence is a series of multiple posts on Less Wrong on the same topic, to coherently and fully explore a particular thesis.
Salient characteristics of “Sequence” are multiple posts, and later builds on previous to the extent that they cannot stand alone. These posts don’t look like they’ll stand on their own (ie, the conclusion is mostly in the 4th post ) so yes, they should be a sequence.
A question for more experienced LW-ers. Is it appropriate for me to tie all of these posts on moral motivation into a sequence? I’m not quite sure what is considered “sequence-worthy.” The sequence page says this:
I think my posts fall under that category. But they don’t fit the prototype of a sequence, a la Mysterious Answers to Mysterious Questions.
Salient characteristics of “Sequence” are multiple posts, and later builds on previous to the extent that they cannot stand alone. These posts don’t look like they’ll stand on their own (ie, the conclusion is mostly in the 4th post ) so yes, they should be a sequence.
By the upvotes your comment is getting, I infer that people agree with you. Thank you for clarification.