I’ll take an offtopic digression to talk about authors I love very much, which your comment reminded me of.
That FUAFI notion you just quoted, according to Wikipedia, is a Platonic approach to layered realities, in a very notoriously Christian work of fiction. Nietzsche wrote some very interesting things on the love story between Christianity and Platonism… Most amusingly, in his segment “‘Reason’ in Philosophy” he arguably comes off as an especially passionate and vitriolic proto-rationalist. It might be an amusing exercise to compare Nietzsche’s “Philosophizing with a Hammer” to Hunter S. Thompson brand of “gonzo journalism”. The comicbook expy of the latter, Spider Jerusalem, is also very interesting from a LW POV, partly because of the trademark Weridtopia he lives in, partly because of his passionate commitment to spreading the truth about a system he felt was decadent and corrupt, something he shares with both those two historical characters, and perhaps a few more people. With one noticeable difference: unlike them, we like to think we’re being objective, and that we’ve got the science to prove it.
I’ll take an offtopic digression to talk about authors I love very much, which your comment reminded me of.
That FUAFI notion you just quoted, according to Wikipedia, is a Platonic approach to layered realities, in a very notoriously Christian work of fiction. Nietzsche wrote some very interesting things on the love story between Christianity and Platonism… Most amusingly, in his segment “‘Reason’ in Philosophy” he arguably comes off as an especially passionate and vitriolic proto-rationalist. It might be an amusing exercise to compare Nietzsche’s “Philosophizing with a Hammer” to Hunter S. Thompson brand of “gonzo journalism”. The comicbook expy of the latter, Spider Jerusalem, is also very interesting from a LW POV, partly because of the trademark Weridtopia he lives in, partly because of his passionate commitment to spreading the truth about a system he felt was decadent and corrupt, something he shares with both those two historical characters, and perhaps a few more people. With one noticeable difference: unlike them, we like to think we’re being objective, and that we’ve got the science to prove it.