The fact that you said it would take a long series of posts to explain your idea threw me off, and I was kind of surprised when you said congratulations
“Decide as though your decision is about the output of a Platonic computation” is the key insight that started me off—not the only idea—and considering how long philosophers have wrangled this, there’s the whole edifice of justification that would be needed for a serious exposition. Maybe come Aug 26th or thereabouts I’ll post a very quick summary of e.g. integration with Pearl’s causality.
“Decide as though your decision is about the output of a Platonic computation” is the key insight that started me off—not the only idea—and considering how long philosophers have wrangled this, there’s the whole edifice of justification that would be needed for a serious exposition. Maybe come Aug 26th or thereabouts I’ll post a very quick summary of e.g. integration with Pearl’s causality.