I object to the tone of this post
So do I, in retrospect. Shouldn’t have attacked Richard Dawkins. Apparently he’s a polarizing figure `round these parts.
Yes, that must be it; it couldn’t possibly be that you were in fact saying insubstantiable things.
I was using a poorly-chosen example, not making a point. You don’t substantiate examples, they substantiate points.
I object to the tone of this post
So do I, in retrospect. Shouldn’t have attacked Richard Dawkins. Apparently he’s a polarizing figure `round these parts.
Yes, that must be it; it couldn’t possibly be that you were in fact saying insubstantiable things.
I was using a poorly-chosen example, not making a point. You don’t substantiate examples, they substantiate points.