Indeed, but notice the basic logical error you’re making:
[doing science] → [seeking to be less wrong]
does not imply
[seeking to be less wrong] → [doing science]
(i.e. if an implication is true, it does not follow that its logical inverse is true)
(Or, in other words: “ways to be less wrong” is a superset of “ways of doing science”.)
I am OK to limit this question to “seeking to be less wrong” scope. Downvote without reason is still a problem.
Indeed, but notice the basic logical error you’re making:
does not imply
(i.e. if an implication is true, it does not follow that its logical inverse is true)
(Or, in other words: “ways to be less wrong” is a superset of “ways of doing science”.)
I am OK to limit this question to “seeking to be less wrong” scope. Downvote without reason is still a problem.