The data you point to only seem to suggest the universe is large; how do they also suggest it “is large relative to the space of physical possibilities”? The likelihood ratio seems pretty close as far as I can see.
With steven, I don’t see how, on your account, any of your actions can in fact effect the “proportion of my future selves to lead eudaimonic existences”. If people in your past couldn’t effect the total chance of your existing, how is it that you can effect the total chance of any particular future you existing? And how can there be a differing relative chance if the total chances all stay constant?
The data you point to only seem to suggest the universe is large; how do they also suggest it “is large relative to the space of physical possibilities”? The likelihood ratio seems pretty close as far as I can see.
With steven, I don’t see how, on your account, any of your actions can in fact effect the “proportion of my future selves to lead eudaimonic existences”. If people in your past couldn’t effect the total chance of your existing, how is it that you can effect the total chance of any particular future you existing? And how can there be a differing relative chance if the total chances all stay constant?