I think this is the motivation behind ideas like tabooing solutions and defining the problem first. This sets an explicit context of decoupling for talking about the facts of the problem, and then a different explicit context of “contextualizing” the agreed-upon problem in terms of proposing solutions.
I wonder if running these as an ongoing, alternating pattern would be a useful method for breaking long-standing log jams.
I think this is the motivation behind ideas like tabooing solutions and defining the problem first. This sets an explicit context of decoupling for talking about the facts of the problem, and then a different explicit context of “contextualizing” the agreed-upon problem in terms of proposing solutions.
I wonder if running these as an ongoing, alternating pattern would be a useful method for breaking long-standing log jams.