This sounds like it assumes you’ll never have to pull into a space less than a few cars lengths long. In other words, it assumes a context where the skill doesn’t actually matter, and you don’t need to be better at it than the bare minimum.
That would be my implication not his. He wasn’t saying no one ever needs to parallel park, only that he was nominating that space as a opportunity for me to practice reversing in even though I’d likely go head first in.
Honestly I don’t know.
There’s no selection pressure there to converge on an optimal teaching method even if there is one.
I mean it’s still universal in tests, which even if it’s a pointless exercise, means there is SOME selection pressure.
That would be my implication not his. He wasn’t saying no one ever needs to parallel park, only that he was nominating that space as a opportunity for me to practice reversing in even though I’d likely go head first in.
Honestly I don’t know.
I mean it’s still universal in tests, which even if it’s a pointless exercise, means there is SOME selection pressure.