In short, I feel your “explanation” doesn’t look inside black boxes, only shuffles them around.
That’s not Adam Bell’s fault. Those black boxes are inherent in CDT. You can read a CDT proponent’s formal treatment of causal probabilities here, and see for yourself.
That’s not Adam Bell’s fault. Those black boxes are inherent in CDT. You can read a CDT proponent’s formal treatment of causal probabilities here, and see for yourself.