For any bit of evidence E0, you can always back it out based on E1,E2...
As P(E0|E1,E2,...)
Analysis starts in some context of belief. You can question bits of “evidence”, and do a finer analysis, but the goal is usually to get a good answer, not reevaluate all your premises.
It seems like in order to go from P(H) to P(H|E) you have to become certain that E.
You need to be certain enough for the analysis at hand.
For any bit of evidence E0, you can always back it out based on E1,E2...
As P(E0|E1,E2,...)
Analysis starts in some context of belief. You can question bits of “evidence”, and do a finer analysis, but the goal is usually to get a good answer, not reevaluate all your premises.
You need to be certain enough for the analysis at hand.