“You are not your thoughts, because you can observe your thoughts, and you can’t be something that you can observe”. If this is viewed purely as an intellectual position, it is easy to think of a counterargument for it… For example, we can write a computer program which happens to internally assign information about its memory use to a variable called memoryuse, and then monitors the content of that variable to make sure that it is not using too much memory
Yeah, I’ve always found that argument confusing for that reason. Thanks for clarifying.
Yeah, I’ve always found that argument confusing for that reason. Thanks for clarifying.