A note of thanks to you, Vladimir. You’re doing a great job, and I’m sure I’m not the only one who appreciates it. (This reads a little stiff—Australian males are not well trained in gratitude—but it’s heartfelt. Thanks.)
meta: You replied to my comment with a note directed to V. Because you replied to me, I received notification of your comment (but he didn’t). To see your praise he’d have to check back here. If you’d commented on his comment and said something like “I second matt’s thanks” you’d have communicated the same thing but V’d have been more likely to see it.
I especially think the post summaries on sequence pages will be handy to lots of people.
I don’t understand why you stated this here. I neither participated in writing of post summaries, nor plan to, and I even think that adding post summaries to primary sequence pages might be a bad idea, if they are too wordy.
A note of thanks to you, Vladimir. You’re doing a great job, and I’m sure I’m not the only one who appreciates it.
(This reads a little stiff—Australian males are not well trained in gratitude—but it’s heartfelt. Thanks.)
Seconded. I especially think the post summaries on sequence pages will be handy to lots of people.
meta:
You replied to my comment with a note directed to V. Because you replied to me, I received notification of your comment (but he didn’t). To see your praise he’d have to check back here. If you’d commented on his comment and said something like “I second matt’s thanks” you’d have communicated the same thing but V’d have been more likely to see it.
I don’t understand why you stated this here. I neither participated in writing of post summaries, nor plan to, and I even think that adding post summaries to primary sequence pages might be a bad idea, if they are too wordy.
Ah, ok. I thought I remembered seeing some edits from you adding post summaries. Anyway, I like the post summaries.