Ignoring criticism should be a respectable stance, since it counteracts motivation for suppressing criticism. But bad criticism should be discouraged or made less visible, in the same way as any other low-value contributions/comments.
So it seems fine to not particularly care about things said to you, any more than if it was said to someone else (or about someone else’s work), while at the same time putting a lot of priority on how adequately others are shaping the motivations for how those things would be said. A piece of criticism being highly upvoted is some sort of claim, either about the value of the criticism, or about values of the voters. But it shouldn’t be an obligation, or else such claims will increasingly (be influenced to) fail to materialize.
Ignoring criticism should be a respectable stance, since it counteracts motivation for suppressing criticism. But bad criticism should be discouraged or made less visible, in the same way as any other low-value contributions/comments.
So it seems fine to not particularly care about things said to you, any more than if it was said to someone else (or about someone else’s work), while at the same time putting a lot of priority on how adequately others are shaping the motivations for how those things would be said. A piece of criticism being highly upvoted is some sort of claim, either about the value of the criticism, or about values of the voters. But it shouldn’t be an obligation, or else such claims will increasingly (be influenced to) fail to materialize.