What I make of those studies is that stimulating the thalamus activates the whole corticothalemic loop. The non-specific or activating nuclei of the thalamus switch on matched areas of cortex. The thalamus has a powerful regulatory role, but it’s not making decisions, it’s enforcing them. The government that sits in DC is making decisions and that’s why we call it the seat of the government. Your metaphor simply does not go through and it makes you sound confused.
The government’s decisions are influenced from elsewhere, and they are enacted elsewhere. But the thalamist’s role is much less like the Congress or Senate and much more like the people who enact and enforce the decisions made by those governing bodies. The decisions about what becomes conscious are made elsewhere, in the conjunction of the cortex and basal ganglia. Decisions about whether to be conscious or unconscious or made in subthalamic nuclei, and again only enforced or enacted by the thalamus.
There you said the thalamus is where consciousness is happening. That is just flat wrong. It’s a system phenomenon. Trending towards statements like that is why it’s a mistake to say any place is the seat of consciousness; it leads to very wrong conceptions and statements like that.
Government largely happens in DC. Consciousness largely happens throughout thalamocortical loops.
The reason I thought this is worth mentioning is that talking about a seat of consciousness confuses the whole phenomenon of consciousness. It implies that consciousness is some little add-on happening in some little corner of the brain, when that’s not right at all; consciousness is a highly complex phenomena involving much of the brain’s higher functions.
What I make of those studies is that stimulating the thalamus activates the whole corticothalemic loop.
Yes, precisely, but the inverse is not the case. It seems to make a strong argument that the loops “start” in the thalamus and that the thalamus has a primary role.
There you said the thalamus is where consciousness is happening. That is just flat wrong. It’s a system phenomenon.
Literally every empirical phenomenon is a system phenomenon at some level. Everything is the undifferentiated Brahman according to the Kharmic religions, and they’re basically right in some sense. But we make abstractions for events which are local in space and time.
US federal governance or a match of fisticuffs in an arena are complex system phenomena with many disparate influences but the language and abstractions we use place these things at a particular place and time because that is where these influences converge in time and space and resolve their conflicts.
(I think our discussion has become perfectly looped at this point.)
What I make of those studies is that stimulating the thalamus activates the whole corticothalemic loop. The non-specific or activating nuclei of the thalamus switch on matched areas of cortex. The thalamus has a powerful regulatory role, but it’s not making decisions, it’s enforcing them. The government that sits in DC is making decisions and that’s why we call it the seat of the government. Your metaphor simply does not go through and it makes you sound confused.
The government’s decisions are influenced from elsewhere, and they are enacted elsewhere. But the thalamist’s role is much less like the Congress or Senate and much more like the people who enact and enforce the decisions made by those governing bodies. The decisions about what becomes conscious are made elsewhere, in the conjunction of the cortex and basal ganglia. Decisions about whether to be conscious or unconscious or made in subthalamic nuclei, and again only enforced or enacted by the thalamus.
There you said the thalamus is where consciousness is happening. That is just flat wrong. It’s a system phenomenon. Trending towards statements like that is why it’s a mistake to say any place is the seat of consciousness; it leads to very wrong conceptions and statements like that.
Government largely happens in DC. Consciousness largely happens throughout thalamocortical loops.
The reason I thought this is worth mentioning is that talking about a seat of consciousness confuses the whole phenomenon of consciousness. It implies that consciousness is some little add-on happening in some little corner of the brain, when that’s not right at all; consciousness is a highly complex phenomena involving much of the brain’s higher functions.
Yes, precisely, but the inverse is not the case. It seems to make a strong argument that the loops “start” in the thalamus and that the thalamus has a primary role.
Literally every empirical phenomenon is a system phenomenon at some level. Everything is the undifferentiated Brahman according to the Kharmic religions, and they’re basically right in some sense. But we make abstractions for events which are local in space and time.
US federal governance or a match of fisticuffs in an arena are complex system phenomena with many disparate influences but the language and abstractions we use place these things at a particular place and time because that is where these influences converge in time and space and resolve their conflicts.
(I think our discussion has become perfectly looped at this point.)