So what is the conclusion you arrive at? And where can we read the full text of the study, since it is gated.
The last quote you provide is not very informative. I read that the woman had the experience FIRST and was asked AFTERWARDS if she could have made an accurate prediction. From the rest of your post I understood that it was supposed to happen the other way round.
The woman had the experience first and was asked afterwards which type of information would help her make an accurate prediction for both the date she just had, and for another “date”. (Don’t know if these were separate questions.)
I think that’s the right way of doing it. So I withdraw my objection.
So what is the conclusion you arrive at? And where can we read the full text of the study, since it is gated.
The last quote you provide is not very informative. I read that the woman had the experience FIRST and was asked AFTERWARDS if she could have made an accurate prediction. From the rest of your post I understood that it was supposed to happen the other way round.
The woman had the experience first and was asked afterwards which type of information would help her make an accurate prediction for both the date she just had, and for another “date”. (Don’t know if these were separate questions.)
I think that’s the right way of doing it. So I withdraw my objection.