Does it mean that if people can be revived successfully into indefinite lifespans, then there would be no need to freeze people going forward?
Why would there be? Once you have the technology to bring people back from the dead, why freeze and unfreeze them first?
I’m pretty uncertain about my morality, but I do think I would prefer more happy lives all else equal, even if that means lots of old folks and few young folks. Not sure I would prefer reviving the holograms to people just having kids though.
As a newcomer I’m sure these have been discussed over and over, and pointers to the relevant discussions are welcome in place of rehashing old arguments.
I don’t remember any discussion along quite these lines. I think you’re good.
Why would there be? Once you have the technology to bring people back from the dead, why freeze and unfreeze them first?
I’m pretty uncertain about my morality, but I do think I would prefer more happy lives all else equal, even if that means lots of old folks and few young folks. Not sure I would prefer reviving the holograms to people just having kids though.
I don’t remember any discussion along quite these lines. I think you’re good.