If you have a US startup called X and you don’t have x.com, you should probably change your name.
The reason is not just that people can’t find you. For companies with mobile apps, especially, having the right domain name is not as critical as it used to be for getting users. The problem with not having the .com of your name is that it signals weakness. Unless you’re so big that your reputation precedes you, a marginal domain suggests you’re a marginal company. Whereas (as Stripe shows) having x.com signals strength even if it has no relation to what you do.
...
100% of the top 20 YC companies by valuation have the .com of their name. 94% of the top 50 do. But only 66% of companies in the current batch have the .com of their name. Which suggests there are lessons ahead for most of the rest, one way or another
Yes, but I don’t see why Paul thinks that’s a good thing when you’re actually not strong.
Usually, I think his advice is spot on, but in this case his advice that you want to signal that you’re strong when you’re actually not seems backwards. You don’t want to be seen as a credible threat to competitors until you’re ACTUALLY able to defend yourself.
Change your name by Paul Graham
...
This seems to me a clear case of reversing (most of) the causation.
turns out when you’re a billion dollar startup you can afford to buy the .com of your name regardless of what it is.
Exactly.
Which makes it a good target for signalling. If you want to seem strong, you get the domain.
Yes, but I don’t see why Paul thinks that’s a good thing when you’re actually not strong.
Usually, I think his advice is spot on, but in this case his advice that you want to signal that you’re strong when you’re actually not seems backwards. You don’t want to be seen as a credible threat to competitors until you’re ACTUALLY able to defend yourself.
I have no experience with startups, but I imagine most startups fail because of apathy (from either customers or investors), rather than enemy action.
That’s true… I wonder, would a .com provoke non-apathy?