Ironically this is the purely semantic disagreement the post warns about. Let’s say I found a “pattern”, that apples falls to the ground, I end up believing that apples fall towards the ground, I anticipate this to be the case. How is that any different from the thing the post is talking about? What use are the so called “patterns” if they don’t predict/anticipate anything inferentially?
Ironically this is the purely semantic disagreement the post warns about. Let’s say I found a “pattern”, that apples falls to the ground, I end up believing that apples fall towards the ground, I anticipate this to be the case. How is that any different from the thing the post is talking about? What use are the so called “patterns” if they don’t predict/anticipate anything inferentially?