Why should whether someone is a justificationist impact how they read the thread about the conjunction fallacy?
Because justificationism is relevant to that, and most everything else.
That shouldn’t be substantially impacted by philosophical issues.
Seriously? You don’t even know that there are philosophical issues about the nature of emotion, the proper ways to evaluate its presence, and so on?
Because justificationism is relevant to that, and most everything else.
Seriously? You don’t even know that there are philosophical issues about the nature of emotion, the proper ways to evaluate its presence, and so on?