I understand the epistemic health concerns, but I think “AI 2027” was great since I don’t think the alternatives would have gained as much attention and it does cleanly summarize the scenario. Even if actual timelines are longer (which imo they probably are) my guess is it is still a net positive as long as readers properly understood the dangers and thought the sequence of events were believable enough.
I understand the epistemic health concerns, but I think “AI 2027” was great since I don’t think the alternatives would have gained as much attention and it does cleanly summarize the scenario. Even if actual timelines are longer (which imo they probably are) my guess is it is still a net positive as long as readers properly understood the dangers and thought the sequence of events were believable enough.