Thanks, that’s interesting. Hadn’t seen that (insofar as I can remember). Definitely overlap there.
I think probabilistic safety measures can be good if we stack a lot of them together in the right way.
Same, and that’s a good/crisp way to put it.
Maybe post a summary at the top, and say people are welcome to give feedback after just having read the summary.
Will edit at some point so as to follow the first part of that suggestion. Thanks!
I think you’ll find it easier to get feedback if you keep your writing brief. (..) I think I might have been able to generate the bullet points above based on a 2-paragraph executive summary of your post.
Some things in that bullet-list addresses stuff I left out to cut length, and stuff I though I would address in future parts of the series. Found also those parts of bullet-list helpful, but still this exemplifies dilemmas/tradeoffs regarding length. Will try to make more effort to look for things to make shorter based on your advice. And I should have read through this one more before publishing.
Thanks, that’s interesting. Hadn’t seen that (insofar as I can remember). Definitely overlap there.
Same, and that’s a good/crisp way to put it.
Will edit at some point so as to follow the first part of that suggestion. Thanks!
Some things in that bullet-list addresses stuff I left out to cut length, and stuff I though I would address in future parts of the series. Found also those parts of bullet-list helpful, but still this exemplifies dilemmas/tradeoffs regarding length. Will try to make more effort to look for things to make shorter based on your advice. And I should have read through this one more before publishing.