The GPT-4 simulation of Golem XIV certainly does teach us a rather convincing lesson in epistemic humility.
I have tried to explore some non-anthropocentric avenues and some “AI existential safety without alignment” approaches, for example, in this essay.
However, the “Golem XIV’s exegesis” does make me wonder, if I am still being too anthropocentric when I try to formulate one of the more invariant non-anthropocentric values as
taking interests of “all sentient beings” into account
I really like the Appendix.
The GPT-4 simulation of Golem XIV certainly does teach us a rather convincing lesson in epistemic humility.
I have tried to explore some non-anthropocentric avenues and some “AI existential safety without alignment” approaches, for example, in this essay.
However, the “Golem XIV’s exegesis” does make me wonder, if I am still being too anthropocentric when I try to formulate one of the more invariant non-anthropocentric values as