27 without mimicking expressions, 30 with—which is probably a small enough spread to be explainable by chance.
Oddly, though, there’s almost no overlap between the answers I got wrong: only one mistake appears on both lists. This might indicate that different reasoning pathways are being engaged, but a sample size of one is far from conclusive; did anyone else notice something similar going on?
27 without mimicking expressions, 30 with—which is probably a small enough spread to be explainable by chance.
Oddly, though, there’s almost no overlap between the answers I got wrong: only one mistake appears on both lists. This might indicate that different reasoning pathways are being engaged, but a sample size of one is far from conclusive; did anyone else notice something similar going on?