If I understand all of someone’s logical arguments for believing what they believe, and I have the knowledge and processing power needed to evaluate those arguments,
Outside of math you also need the relevant evidence, i.e., observations, which requires you to trust that they have been accurately reported.
Outside of math you also need the relevant evidence, i.e., observations, which requires you to trust that they have been accurately reported.
Agreed. That’s part of the “knowledge” I had in mind.
True, true, and true.