Okay, that makes sense to me so thank you for explaining!
I guess what I was pointing at with the language thing is the question of what the actual underlying objects that you called XYZ were and their relation to the linguistic explanation of language as a contextually dependent symbol defined by many scenarios rather than some sort of logic.
Like if we use IB it might be easy to look at that as a probability distribution of probability distributions? I just thought it was interesting to get some more context on how language might help in an alignment plan.
Okay, that makes sense to me so thank you for explaining!
I guess what I was pointing at with the language thing is the question of what the actual underlying objects that you called XYZ were and their relation to the linguistic explanation of language as a contextually dependent symbol defined by many scenarios rather than some sort of logic.
Like if we use IB it might be easy to look at that as a probability distribution of probability distributions? I just thought it was interesting to get some more context on how language might help in an alignment plan.