I like how EA is a “controversial philosophical and social movement that...”, but e/acc is merely a “philosophical and social movement advocating for...”.
I guess, for some editor, EA is an outgroup, while e/acc is a fargroup.
Plenty of pages get the bare minimum. The level of detail in the e/acc page (eg including the emoji associated with the movement) makes me think that it was edited by an e/acc. The EA page must have been edited by the e/acc since it includes “opposition to e/acc”, but other than that it seems like it was written by someone unaffiliated with either (modulo my changes). We could probably check out the history of the pages to resolve our speculation.
I like how EA is a “controversial philosophical and social movement that...”, but e/acc is merely a “philosophical and social movement advocating for...”.
I guess, for some editor, EA is an outgroup, while e/acc is a fargroup.
Plenty of pages get the bare minimum. The level of detail in the e/acc page (eg including the emoji associated with the movement) makes me think that it was edited by an e/acc. The EA page must have been edited by the e/acc since it includes “opposition to e/acc”, but other than that it seems like it was written by someone unaffiliated with either (modulo my changes). We could probably check out the history of the pages to resolve our speculation.
EA definitely has more controversies. Doesn’t mean it’s worse for the world.